Editor's introduction: Nowadays, face recognition can be seen in many occasions, such as paying bills in supermarkets, brushing faces in parks, schools, taking transportation, etc.; with the development of technology, face recognition has more uses, but security And privacy is unknown; the author of this article shared the public application buy email list boundaries of face recognition, let's take a look. The widespread application of face recognition technology is an indisputable fact now; we have also introduced a lot of industry status quo of face recognition in related security, travel, finance, security and other fields. A while ago, we also discussed the social risk of private abuse of face recognition caused by the low threshold of AI technology on the topic.
This makes the application risk of face recognition continue to be discussed. It sounds like a cliché, but we seem to be overlooking a more serious problem. Compared with ordinary people abroad who are vigilant about face recognition technology, our tolerance for face buy email list recognition technology is a bit too high; so much so that public places and businesses in some places regard "swiping face" as digital The selling point of the upgrade is going fast, while completely ignoring the privacy and security of the user's face, and even using face recognition as a tool for corporate marketing and "big data". Now, as ordinary consumers.
But this should not be a carnival of a "privacy-free society" for granted, nor should we easily give up our last bit of privacy for convenience; at least when these buy email list institutions and companies take away our face data At the same time, ask a question: "How will you use my data, and will you keep my data safe?" The key question we are going to discuss this time is: where is the public application boundary of face recognition? 1. The first case of face recognition: I have already recorded my fingerprints, why should I replace it with a face recognition A complaint filed by Hangzhou citizen Guo Bing brought the issue of "the legality of the application of face recognition technology" into the public eye.